CfD Requirement in 2027: What Will Change for PV Investors?

Starting in July 2027, the EU will transition its support framework for new PV systems of 100 kW or more to bilateral contracts for difference (CfDs). What investors need to know about the December 31, 2026, deadline, returns, and their strategy — as of July 2026.

The short answer

Germany is transitioning its support system under the Renewable Energy Sources Act to bilateral Contracts for Difference (CfDs). Under EU law, new support contracts for wind, solar, and geothermal energy must be structured as CfDs starting July 17, 2027 (Art. 19d of the Internal Electricity Market Regulation). This applies to new EEG-eligible installations with a capacity of 100 kW or more. The CfD model guarantees a minimum revenue but captures excess revenue during periods of high market prices. The Federal Cabinet approved the government’s draft of the EEG 2027 on July 29, 2026; deliberations in the Bundestag will begin in September 2026, and the amendment has not yet entered into force. Plants commissioned by December 31, 2026, will remain under the previous unilateral support scheme.

The CfD requirement for photovoltaics starting in 2027 represents the most significant change to the renewable energy support framework since the introduction of the sliding market premium. For new PV systems of 100 kW or more, a two-way contract for difference will replace the previous one-way subsidy—with a guaranteed minimum revenue but a capped premium for high prices. System operators and investors should know which systems are affected, what the December 31, 2026, deadline means, and how returns will change. The guide to the direct marketing of PV electricity provides an in-depth look at how the ongoing sale of solar power at market prices already works today.

What is the 2027 CfD requirement?

In short: A two-way contract for difference (CfD) offsets the difference between a fixed reference price (target value) and the actual annual market value in both directions. If the market price is below the reference price, the government pays a premium; if it is above, the plant operator repays a refinancing contribution. The electricity continues to be sold on the market.

This requirement stems from the EU electricity market reform: Article 19d of the revised Internal Electricity Market Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/943, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1747, in effect since July 16, 2024) stipulates that, starting July 17, 2027, new price support contracts for wind, solar, and geothermal energy—must be structured as bilateral spread contracts as of July 17, 2027. The principle itself is therefore non-negotiable—only the national implementation of the detailed parameters in the Renewable Energy Act of 2027 is subject to negotiation.

Bilateral difference contracts instead of a unilateral market premium

The difference from the current system lies in its symmetry. The previous sliding market premium was one-sided: it only kicked in when market prices were low, while plant operators retained all revenues above the applicable value. The two-sided CfD caps precisely these excess revenues. The goal of the reform is to integrate renewables into the market—ensuring predictable refinancing while simultaneously limiting windfall profits in years of high prices. The reference is the annual market value for solar power, specific to each energy source, which transmission system operators publish on netztransparenz.de.

One-sided market premium vs. two-sided CFD
FeatureMarket Premium TodayCfD starting in 2027
Low priceTop-up to the required valueTop-up to the required value
High pricePlant operators retain excess revenueRefund of the refinancing contribution
Risk ProfileOpportunity to move upMinimum revenue secured, cap set
Reference valueAnnual Market Value of SolarAnnual Market Value of Solar
Source: Art. 19d of Regulation (EU) 2024/1747; Raue LLP (March 13, 2026); BBH Blog (April 7, 2026).

Who will be affected starting in 2027—and who won't?

In short: According to the Federal Ministry of Economics’ draft bill, the refinancing contribution applies to new EEG-subsidized plants with an installed capacity of 100 kW or more. Biomass is exempt. Existing plants and electricity consumed on-site remain unaffected. The EU regulation allows exemptions only for small-scale and demonstration plants; the specific 100-kW threshold is set by the German draft.
17.07.2027

As of this date, new support contracts must be structured as bilateral CfDs (Art. 19d of the EU Electricity Market Regulation).

100 kW

Threshold for the refinancing contribution under the government's draft bill; biomass is excluded.

31.12.2026

Deadline: Commissioning by that date means continued unilateral EEG subsidies for 20 years.

The key distinction is between self-consumption and grid feed-in. Solar power used for personal consumption is not compensated under the EEG and is therefore not subject to the refinancing contribution. This applies to subsidized grid feed-in starting at 100 kW—whether it involves full feed-in or surplus feed-in from partial feed-in. For rooftop PV systems and ground-mounted installations under 100 kW, the current model will remain in place for the time being. Those who market their electricity entirely without EEG subsidies via a power purchase agreement (PPA) are not directly affected—however, the draft includes an anti-circumvention clause that prevents a flexible annual switch.

Existing EEG facilities are protected under the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. The EU regulation explicitly applies only to new price support contracts effective July 17, 2027; there are no provisions for retroactive application to existing feed-in tariff commitments. As it stands, the government’s draft of the EEG 2027 also applies only to new installations and leaves the grandfathering provisions for the full 20-year term unaffected.

EEG 2027: What Is the Status of the Law in July 2026?

In short: The Federal Cabinet approved the government’s draft of the EEG 2027 on July 29, 2026, along with the Grid Package. Deliberations in the Bundestag will begin in September 2026. The amendment is not yet legally binding—changes may still be made during the parliamentary process.

The time pressure is real, as the EU state aid approval for the current EEG expires on December 31, 2026. Federal Minister of Economic Affairs Katherina Reiche had promised at the BDEW Congress on June 10, 2026, to bring the EEG and the Grid Package before the Cabinet before the summer recess. The deadline was pushed back by a few weeks: The Cabinet ultimately approved the government’s draft on July 29, 2026, along with the Grid Package. Parliamentary deliberations will begin in September 2026.

One of the key points of contention between the CDU/CSU and the SPD is the Federal Ministry of Economics’ plan to eliminate the feed-in tariff for small-scale installations under 25 kW. This change is politically controversial and has not yet been finalized; the current tariff rates are explained in the 2026 EEG Tariff Guide.

As a minimal parliamentary initiative, the Bündnis 90/Die Grünen parliamentary group introduced its own draft of the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) on July 7, 2026 (Bundestag Document 21/6914), which implements only the provisions mandated by the EU: the CfD refinancing contribution for capacities of 100 kW and above, plus resilience tenders. The risk of a funding gap is legally substantiated: A legal opinion by the law firm Raue for the BEE (June 22, 2026) warns that without a new authorization in a timely manner, there is a risk of a ban on EEG subsidies under EU law taking effect as of January 1, 2027.

A key change in the government’s draft: The buffer range between the applicable value and the levy—which had been discussed initially—has been eliminated. The refinancing contribution thus applies immediately above the reference price, with no tolerance range—industry associations criticize this because it increases risk premiums in auctions.

Timeline for the 2027 EEG Amendment and Mandatory CfDs (as of August 18, 2026)
StageDateStatus
EU Regulation 2024/1747 enters into force16.07.2024Done
BMWE Working Draft (leaked)26.02.2026public
Draft Bill from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy21.04.2026completed
BEE/Raue Report on the Funding Gap22.06.2026published
Green Party Bill in the Bundestag07.07.2026submitted
Cabinet Decision: Government Bill + Network Package29.07.2026resolved
Bundestag DebateStarting in September 2026pending
EEG subsidy approval is set to expire31.12.2026strict EU deadline
EU Requirement for Bilateral CfDs17.07.2027strict EU deadline
Source: pv magazine (June 10/July 8, 2026); Prometheus (July 9, 2026); klimareporter (July 13, 2026); ZFK Energy Laws Ticker (July 15, 2026); BEE/Raue Report (June 22, 2026).

CfD Mechanism: How Revenues and Returns Change

In short: The CfD mechanism shifts revenue from volatile to predictable. In years with low or normal prices, little actually changes—a refinancing contribution is due only if the annual market value of solar exceeds the applicable value. This has been rare recently: In 2025, the annual market value of solar averaged 4.51 cents per kilowatt-hour.

For facilities subject to a tender process, the applicable value is determined in the Federal Network Agency’s auction. For the March 1, 2026, open-field solar auction, the maximum price was 5.79 ct/kWh, and the volume-weighted average premium was 4.94 ct/kWh. For the July 1, 2026, auction, the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) has raised the maximum price to 5.90 ct/kWh. For rooftop PV systems of 25 kW or more, the government’s draft bill provides for a uniform rate and eliminates the full feed-in bonus. The specific amount remains to be determined during the parliamentary process; figures currently circulating vary widely and are deliberately not specified here.

Comparison of CfD-Relevant Reference Prices
Figures are in ct/kWh. The maximum value for open-field sites, 5.79 ct, corresponds to 100%.
Annual Market Value of Solar
(Average for 2025)
4,51
Average Surcharge for Open Space
BNetzA March 1, 2026
4,94
Maximum Value for Open Space
BNetzA March 1, 2026
5,79

In terms of returns, this represents a shift in nature, not in level. The guaranteed minimum revenue reduces revenue risk, lowers financing costs, and allows for higher debt-to-equity ratios—in model calculations, financing costs fall by roughly 50 to 100 basis points. The DIW Berlin estimates that CfDs have the potential to reduce societal electricity generation costs by up to 30 percent (Weekly Report 35/2022); for individual operators, the same model translates to more stable but capped margins. Direct investments through the Helm Group continue to yield returns of 6–10 percent per year before taxes (portfolio data for 2024); with tax leverage, returns of up to 10–12 percent are possible.

Illustrative Revenue Scenario (Assumed Value: 5.0 ct/kWh)
ScenarioOne-sided support todayCfD starting in 2027
Low price (market price 3.0 ct)5.0 ct bonus5.0 ct, identical
Regular price (market price 5.0 ct)5.0 ct5.0 ct, identical
High price (market price 7.0 ct)Keep 7.0 ct5.0 ct, 2.0 ct contribution
Illustrative model calculation; not investment advice. Reference value: 5.0 ct/kWh, based on the average surcharge for open-space installations as of March 1, 2026 (4.94 ct/kWh, BNetzA).

The analysis of direct marketing of PV electricity shows how market values evolve over time and why the stock market price doesn't tell the whole story.

Effective Date: December 31, 2026, and Grandfathering

In short: Photovoltaic systems that undergo technical commissioning by December 31, 2026, are expected to still fall under the unilateral subsidy framework of the current EEG—for the full 20-year term, without a refinancing contribution. What matters is the commissioning date recorded in the market master data registry, not the tender award.

The legal basis is sound: The protection of property rights under Article 14 of the German Basic Law (GG) safeguards confidence in existing compensation commitments, and the EU regulation explicitly applies only to new price support contracts. Applying CfDs retroactively to existing facilities would be constitutionally untenable.

The gray area in between remains unresolved: For projects awarded contracts in 2025/2026 but not scheduled for completion until 2027 or 2028, the draft’s transitional provisions have not yet been finalized. This is the key risk factor for large-scale projects with long implementation timelines. Anyone who still wants to meet the deadline needs a secured grid connection, the necessary permits, and a signed construction contract—since delivery times for medium-voltage substations can sometimes exceed one year, a late start to construction in 2026 is unrealistic.

Three Strategies for PV Investors Starting in 2027

In short: The rules point to three paths. First, the “deadline sprint,” with commissioning by December 31, 2026. Second, the “CfD-Ready” strategy for projects starting in 2027, featuring optimized site and storage selection. Third, the PPA path via opt-out and industrial customers. The choice depends on the project’s maturity, the location, and access to customers.

Strategy 1 — Deadline Sprint. Only advisable if grid connection is secured, approval has been granted, and a construction contract has been signed. Advantage: 20 years of unilateral subsidies without a refinancing contribution, plus the full high-price premium. For most greenfield projects, however, the 2026 deadline is no longer achievable due to long lead times.

Strategy 2 — CfD-Ready. The standard approach for large-scale projects planned today. Site selection and storage integration become key factors, because a high profile factor raises market revenues above the required rate of return. The guide to PV systems with battery storage provides further details on the economic viability of storage combinations.

Strategy 3 — The PPA Approach. Suitable for projects with industrial buyers that have strong creditworthiness. Solar PPA prices in Europe stood at 55.05 €/MWh in the first quarter of 2026 — the fifth consecutive quarterly decline (LevelTen European PPA Index). Important: According to the draft, withdrawal from the subsidy program is possible only once and is irrevocable. Those who wish to operate entirely without equity capital can find the details in the article on solar power without equity capital.

Strategy Comparison for PV Investors
CriterionDeadline SprintCfD-ReadyPPA Path
Commissioningthrough December 31, 2026starting in 2027Starting in 2027 (opt-out)
Funding schemeOne-sided EEG fundingContract for DifferenceNo EEG subsidies
High-Price OpportunityfullcappedPPA-fix
Bankabilityhighvery highAverage (customer creditworthiness)
Is 2026 a realistic goal?only if construction begins in 2025Default pathfor industrial customers
Logic Energy's own analysis based on the government draft dated July 29, 2026, and BNetzA auction data. All figures are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
1

Check if the project is ready to proceed

Honestly assess the permit, area, and grid connection status.

2

Check the deadline

Is it realistically feasible to have the system up and running by December 31, 2026?

3

Ensure a stable power connection

Reserve the substation and connection approval early.

4

Select Funding Type

CfD or PPA — Be sure to observe the deadline and opt-out rules.

5

Optimize Location

Profile factor and inventory boost market revenues.

6

Effective July 17, 2027

New subsidy agreements are structured as bilateral CfDs.

Risks, Criticism, and Personal Use

In short: Industry associations are warning of a slump in new installations of small-scale and commercial systems, as well as higher equity capital requirements. For businesses with their own systems, however, the CfD requirement is of little relevance: self-consumption is not subject to the refinancing contribution and remains the most effective economic lever.

Since the first draft, the German Solar Industry Association has been warning of a market slump should the PV feed-in tariff for small-scale systems be eliminated. The German Association for New Energy Economics is calling for a coherent PPA framework instead of a rigid opt-out. The shift in bankability is structurally significant: Higher debt-to-equity ratios under the CfD stabilize financing but shift the investor landscape toward institutional investors with a low tolerance for volatility.

For companies with their own photovoltaic systems, the following applies: Those that consume a significant portion of their solar power themselves have the clearly superior economic case—avoided electricity purchase costs of roughly 20–30 ct/kWh, depending on the volume purchased, are offset by a significantly lower feed-in tariff (BDEW Electricity Price Analysis 04/2026). The CfD logic applies only to surplus feed-in starting at 100 kW, and even then only in years with high electricity prices. Higher rates of self-consumption can be achieved with a battery storage system; the specific economic viability is addressed in the guide to PV systems with battery storage. Nothing changes for lease and electricity supply models without equity investment, as these operate outside the scope of EEG subsidies.

The industry is also responding with a European-wide diversification: Italy is becoming more attractive under its own CfD auction regime, as the market analysis on PV investment in Italy shows. Contracts for Difference are thus evolving from a German exception into the European standard for the energy transition.

Note: This article is intended solely to provide general information about regulatory developments and does not constitute investment, tax, or legal advice. The provisions of the EEG 2027 are based on the government draft dated July 29, 2026, and have not yet been enacted into law. Return figures are based on historical data and are not a guarantee of future results. All information is provided without warranty. As of August 2026.

Take action instead of waiting

Whether it’s a deadline sprint, a CfD-ready site, or a PPA option—we’ll break down what the coming months mean for your specific project. Thanks to the personal liability of mediplan Helm e.K.’s owners, this is a well-founded assessment, not just an anonymous consultation.

Go to the Contact FormPV Investment Overview

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the CfD requirement for photovoltaic systems starting in 2027?

A two-way contract for difference (CfD) offsets the difference between a fixed target value and the annual market value in both directions. In years when prices are low, the plant operator receives a premium; in years when prices are high, the operator pays back a refinancing contribution. Under EU law, new support contracts must be structured as CfDs starting July 17, 2027.

What is the minimum plant size for the CfD to apply starting in 2027?

According to the government draft bill from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs, the refinancing contribution applies to new EEG-subsidized facilities with an installed capacity of 100 kW or more. Biomass is excluded. The EU regulation allows exemptions only for small-scale and demonstration facilities; the final threshold may still change during the legislative process.

Does the CfD also apply to existing PV systems?

No. Existing facilities are protected by the principle of legitimate expectations for their entire 20-year feed-in tariff period. The EU regulation applies only to new feed-in tariff contracts effective July 17, 2027, or later. Plants commissioned on or before December 31, 2026, are expected to remain eligible for unilateral support; however, transitional rules for projects awarded in 2025/2026 are still pending.

When will the EEG 2027 take effect?

The target date is January 1, 2027. The Cabinet approved the government’s draft bill on July 29, 2026; deliberations in the Bundestag will begin in September 2026. A postponement until spring 2027 remains possible. The EU requirement for bilateral CfDs will take effect on July 17, 2027.

Is a solar investment still worth it despite the CfD requirement?

Yes. The CfD alters the risk-return profile but does not eliminate it: It guarantees a minimum return and reduces financing costs. Direct investments through the Helm Group generate a 6–10 percent annual return before taxes. These figures are based on portfolio data and do not guarantee future results. The contracting party is mediplan Helm e.K., with personal liability of the owners pursuant to Sections 1, 17, and 19 of the German Commercial Code (HGB).

What does the CfD requirement mean for businesses that consume their own electricity?

Not much. Solar power consumed on-site is not subject to the refinancing fee. Only surplus feed-in exceeding 100 kW is affected—and even then, only in years when electricity prices are high. Nothing changes for lease and electricity supply models without equity, in which an investor builds the system and the business purchases electricity.

Conclusion: More predictable, but capped

The 2027 CfD requirement makes the revenue from new large-scale PV plants more predictable, but caps the potential for high prices. The requirement itself is enshrined in EU law and takes effect on July 17, 2027; however, as of July 2026, the national implementation in the EEG 2027 remains politically stalled, and a funding gap starting in 2027 is a real possibility. Investors need to keep a clear head now: assess the opportunity presented by the deadline, or else ensure they are CfD-ready or plan for the PPA route.

For those who want to learn more about the basics: An Overview of Photovoltaic Investments. The 2026 EEG Feed-in Tariff Guide explains the feed-in tariff rates, and the Logic Energy Investor Model demonstrates how direct investment works in practice.

References

Related Articles: Solar Peak Act & Negative Electricity Prices · AgNes Reform for PV Investors


Back
Back

Peak Load Reserve: A New Market for Battery Storage – What Investors Need to Know in 2026

Continue
Continue

PV Storage Arbitrage Returns: How Battery Storage Turns Negative Electricity Prices into Revenue